A due-diligence check that stress-tests sustainability claims against evidence, public scrutiny and EU law.
Assess whether public sustainability claims are specific, substantiated, audience-appropriate and consistent with relevant public information. The scan applies EmpCo — Directive (EU) 2024/825, informally known as the "Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition" Directive — primarily to consumer-facing environmental claims and, on a more targeted basis, to material claims about social characteristics (e.g. wages, safety, human rights, equality, inclusion) under the amended Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD) Article 6(1)(b) "main characteristics" test. The EU Forced Labour Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2024/3015) is used here as a product and supply-chain exposure lens for forced-labour-related claims — it is not itself a claims-substantiation regime, creates no new stand-alone due-diligence obligation (Art. 1(3)), and its core prohibition applies from 14 December 2027.
Assess sustainability claims for wording risk, evidence gaps, regulatory sensitivity and relevant public contradictions — not a broad ESG rating.
Specifically, it identifies sustainability wording that may be too broad, insufficiently evidenced, consumer-facing under the EU Empowering Consumers Directive ("EmpCo", Directive (EU) 2024/825), may create forced-labour-related assurance risk, or may be contradicted by relevant external public-source context.
Enter a company name or website (e.g. Inditex, inditex.com). The scan finds the official site and reviews its public pages — sustainability, policies, product/campaign pages, press and investor pages — plus public external signals (media, NGO, regulator, union) when configured. Only public material is checked.
Confirms the exact legal entity against the Belgian KBO/BCE public register and links the scan to its official NACE activity code — recommended when the company name is common or could be confused with an unrelated business.
Public sources only. If a bare company name cannot be confidently matched to an official domain, the scan reports how it resolved the name so you can verify it.
Upload one non-public document — an internal policy draft, unpublished report, supplier contract or memo. Only the uploaded file is reviewed: no website crawl, no external search. Kept separate from website scan results.
Supported: TXT, HTML, MD, CSV, DOCX and PDF. PDF scans work best with selectable text; scanned pages may not be readable. PDFs over 8 MB or 60 pages are read in your browser and only their text is sent.
PDF report: a board-ready claim-risk report with scores, red flags, claim signals, score drivers and action plan — generated as a native PDF, 2–4 pages depending on findings.
A transparent register of retrieved website pages and documents, showing whether each source was fully analysed, partially analysed or yielded limited text. Failed access attempts are listed separately and were not analysed as evidence.
Why the green and social scores are at their current level, based on what was actually retained in this scan.
Claims are grouped by regulatory relevance and claim theme. The classification indicates which legal or substantiation lens may be relevant; it is not a legal finding. Each row shows the key wording, source, audience and main evidence gap. Open a row to review the exact passage and recommended improvement.
Only explicitly negative external stakeholder sources are displayed here. Positive achievements, partnerships, awards, neutral company coverage and company-owned websites, reports, policies or supplier documents are excluded.
Grouped by review lens, based on what this scan actually found. The most material flag in each group is highlighted.
How much of the material could actually be reviewed for this scan, in plain terms. Worth reading before treating a low score as a clean result.